My 2018 Apollo "Desktop Server", or should I say "Server Desktop"?

My 2018 Apollo Desktop

This is one of a series of computer configuration stories, in reverse chronological order. Others are accessible as follows:

  1. 2017 home server go3
  2. 2014 Predecessor home server go-ng
  3. 2009 home server gorilla
Or, return to the home page for this activity.

Project Motivation

Support a 4K display for photo editing, on a native Linux platform with Windows to be available within a VM. Provide large and reliable storage.


So, I recognized that I spend much of my desktop time viewing and editing still photos, many of which are 20 megapixels and above, and that I was doing so on a 1920x1080 (or 2 megapixel) display. Somehow, this seemed wrong. My desktop system dated from 2011, and was midrange at the time. I'd set it for Linux/Windows dual-boot, but (as with many geeks of a "certain age") rarely booted the Windows instance except to run Quicken. I could probably have gotten it to 4K resolution by installing a new graphics card but, hey, it was rather long in the tooth anyway. A project ensued.

I looked at contemporary desktop systems. Many seemed space-constrained and therefore hard to expand, and others had optimizations like Optane memory that didn't seem friendly to dual-boot or Linux configurations. I was happy and glad to do some tinkering, but wanted to be confident that I could achieve a working result that didn't target most of its power at the operating system I wasn't primarily using. I'd had good experience configuring a Dell PowerEdge T30 as a home server that's run almost continuously over the past year and thought it might be just the platform I was looking for. Among other attributes, I've been impressed with its quiet and energy-efficient operation, and had noted that the steps in its configuration Just Worked more smoothly and quickly than I'd thought they might.

I don't do gaming, so expected that the integrated HD P530 graphics support in its Xeon E3-1225v5 CPU (a workstation-class Skylake quad-core processor initially released in 2015, clocked at 3.3 GHz with a Passmark score of 7837) would be sufficient and suitable to drive a 4K display for my purposes. Bare metal Linux, eventually running Windows as needed within a VM, seemed to fit my usage and preferences well. When I saw this very system offered as a Small Business Doorbuster (do Small Businesses actually Bust Doors for sales, one wonders?) at $299, I clicked the requisite buttons to order a second server box and received it a few days later.

Getting it Running

Quite the minimal unpacking for a new computer, whose date stamp indicated that it was freshly manufactured earlier in the month. can't find picture It came without operating system, keyboard, or mouse. I think that the only other item enclosed besides the tower itself was a power cord. In short order, I plugged in a spare USB keyboard, mouse, and wireless NIC, connected an old display panel via a VGA-HDMI adapter, and installed Ubuntu 18.04 Desktop on the system's 1TB boot disk. Having done this, I was able to download and update the system's BIOS to its most current version (and thanks, Dell, for facilitating BIOS updates from Linux environments.) sysbench --threads=4 cpu run indicates about a 1.33x speedup relative to my immediately-preceding desktop, but I've rarely been a CPU-bound kind of user anyway.

I'm still learning about the 4K display world and didn't know whether and what cabling would work how well and at what speeds until my shiny new monitor arrived. As of a day later, I'm now editing on the 4K monitor. It looks beautiful at Gnome 200% scaling, using an HDMI cable that I had lying around. I believe it's now running 3840x2160 @ 30 Hz. I went immediately to the 200% setting as 100% yielded windows and icons that were very tiny. Could probably do 150%, but Gnome doesn't now seem to handle that out of its box. [UPDATE: As of Ubuntu 19.04, 150% scaling is now supported. I've switched to using it along with Wayland display management. I'm liking the result and am comfortably viewing denser content on my display, though had to adjust some application display parameters to fit the environment.] Photos look excellent, but I'm not completely sure whether or not I'm actually scaling their data as well and need to look into that further. 4K video samples seem to stream nicely, even with a 72 Mb/sec wireless connection, though those designated as Chromecast HDR (?) sometimes blank intermittently at least with Firefox. Maybe they want Chrome instead?

I downloaded an evaluation VirtualBox appliance with Win 10 (thanks, Microsoft!) and was able to get it running. can't find screenshot By doing so, I was able to verify that the shared folder mechanism can access underlying data stored on an ext4 file system even though Windows wouldn't be able to read it directly. I've also been pondering directory setup, and decided to configure a RAID1 pair with about 2.5-3 terabytes of space to hold /home. After maybe 30 minutes to install (using cabling and carriers conveniently included with the server) and partition the drives, I started the 4-5 hour process that mdadm requires to initialize the array. If I want to speed up boot time, I could replace the boot disk with a SATA SSD, but this may not really be necessary. The currently installed 24GB of RAM should be (far!) more than enough to handle VM configurations, but the as-shipped 8GB might have been too tight. So, main memory shouldn't be a problem. I've probably overprovisioned the disk and RAM capacity relative to the CPU, but so it is.

After creating the RAID array as discussed above, I merged my home directory from the prior Linux desktop, remounted, and transferred my photo collection into the resulting /home partition. The imported Thunderbird profile Just Worked. I split off a new VeraCrypt volume to hold Quicken data files separately from other encrypted data, to minimize the likelihood and need for interference that could result from opening a single volume from both the Ubuntu host and a Windows VM. Nice to see that the CPU workloads seem to be distributing effectively among the processor's four cores.

After I started using the system, I noticed that the screen would intermittently blank for a couple of seconds at a time (particularly, but not exclusively, during active editing), and would then resume normal operation. Apparently, this is a common issue when running at 4K resolution with slower cables; per specification, the graphics chipset outputs 3840x2160 @ 30Hz, which was introduced in HDMI 1.4 and is certified for operation only with High Speed cables and above. With a lower-rated cable, the display may blink as noise causes the computer and monitor to repeat their protocol handshake. Maybe my old HDMI cable wasn't quite the right thing after all, even though it usually works. I've now ordered a newest-spec Ultra High Speed cable and will see if that makes the blinks go away. And/or, I can try shifting to use the Display Port cables that came with the monitor. Reconnected with the supplied DP cable and the display's now running at 3840x2160 @ 60 Hz. Haven't yet seen any screen blinking. Maybe I'll soon be receiving a redundant HDMI cable.

After a month or so of operation, I decided to take another hardware plunge, moving the system disk onto a Samsung 860 EVO SATA SSD. Clonezilla with default options Just Worked, and it reduced power-up boot time from 1:43 to 1:24 to reach the Ubuntu greeter. (Some of this startup time may derive from the Intel BIOS menu that I see after about 0:17 and try to ignore as it asks me to configure motherboard RAID, but it doesn't appear that this can be shut off.) Looking into the matter further, I adjusted initramfs to match my current swap file's UUID, and boot time is now at about 0:55; Ubuntu might be able to boot somewhat faster in UEFI than in the current legacy mode, but I'm disinclined to go down that reinstallation path and risk destabilizing my smoothly-running system. systemd-analyze time just told me that Startup finished in 2.880s (kernel) + 8.368s (userspace) = 11.248s reached after 7.907s in userspace, so much of the near-minute may be outside OS control anyway. VM speedup is dramatic: start time for my Windows VM went from 0:58 to 0:14 once I moved the .vdi file onto the SSD. Application startup (in both Linux and Windows) seems snappier as well, but I lack an easily comparable means to quantify that.

Pros and cons of this non-traditional approach

Pros and cons

Good things

Less good things

What didn't go so smoothly?

As noted, I was generally pleased or surprised with the way the configuration and migration process went. (Maybe I'm an inherent cynic or pessimist, or have just learned from experience.) Naturally, though, there were some exceptions, but most were more related to aspects of particular software than to the server platform.

What did it cost?

Prices before tax and shipping, where applicable.

Altogether, cheaper even in nominal dollar terms than: can't get jpg this 1983 CP/M system as offered in a Priority One Electronics flyer; in fairness, though, my new machine doesn't have the same bundled software or dot matrix printer. What a difference 35 years makes!