This is one of a series of computer configuration stories, in reverse chronological order. Others are accessible as follows:
I built the site as a self-contained Django application. A customized version of Django's management GUI provides a convenient means to upload photos and to manage the embedded SQLite database which references them. My customizations to the admin interface include application-specific capabilities like hashing files to support uniqueness checks, calling out to ImageMagick to generate display-sized and thumbnail-sized image versions to be served, and invoking the Python ExifRead library to extract camera-generated metadata. When I migrated my existing images from my predecessor site, the Django shell provided a convenient and powerful platform for scripting the operations needed to build corresponding objects within Django's database model.
On the user interface side, a user can query the database for entries with particular species and/or photos taken in particular years or months. The current query set is maintained in session context, and successive requests can narrow it. For example, an initial request for birds whose name contains the string "yellow" can be filtered to those photographed during months of April, or during April in a particular year. Once a selection is made, navigation buttons allow successive images within the selection to be displayed.
I'd previously discovered the extensive range of DigitalOcean tutorials describing system configuration operations, which helped to place them positively in my mind as I looked at cloud hosting options. DigitalOcean's minimal "droplet" (using their term for a cloud-based unit of computing power; given a meteorological analogy, it makes sense that clouds should be comprised of droplets), with 1GB of RAM and 25GB of storage for $5 (USD) per month, seemed perfect to hold an Ubuntu VM and to accumulate and serve my files. Unless my photos become virally popular (and perhaps not even then), it seems unlikely that I'll exceed the 1TB outbound data transfer limit above which additional charges apply.
I think I made a fine choice; my vaviary.net is
now running happily with only about 11% of its available storage in use.
DigitalOcean provides nice instrumentation and graph-based displays to monitor
droplet resource usage.Even though the
sysbench benchmark indicates performance about 8 times slower than
my desktop, it seems wholly adequate to serve my small application. Should this become a
significant limitation in future, it's possible to expand to a more powerful droplet.
Using DigitalOcean's documentation where applicable (which covered most configuration needs), I was impressed with the speed with which I was able to configure Apache, Python, and Django to support my application. Once I'd transferred my code and data from my development desktop, revised Django settings to correspond to the file locations to which images are uploaded and served, and adjusted some file permissions, it basically worked. I avoided transferring admin GUI passwords in plaintext by following DigitalOcean's convenient instructions to set up auto-renewing Let's Encrypt certificates, though I found it a bit messy to get them working with an Apache virtual host so as to serve the https address form. Django's documentation seems to discourage serving media files from the same server that serves Django-rendered pages; while this is probably good practice for larger sites, the self-contained approach seems to be working fine at my modest scale.
Reviewing log files as an interested security person, I was "interested" to note the site being scanned starting only moments after its activation. I was glad to be able to apply a DigitalOcean project-level firewall outside the droplet itself to block ports other than http(s) and ssh, but still observe repeated attack attempts on those necessary ports, trying ssh passwords and, e.g., tries to access a long list of php admin files on this site where php isn't even used. I guess that's life for web-facing services today, and this observation left me doubly glad to have hosted my site on a location separate from my home server. I noted and took DigitalOcean's recommendation to use only key-based login access for ssh, disabling password-based logins.
My expenses were mostly in the form of time, well spent as I acquired interesting and valuable skills and knowledge in the project and in the course that led to it. I was glad to support edX with a certificate fee, and am fine paying for a domain registration and $5/month for cloud services to establish a suitable presence for my photos. I used only open source tools, and have been particularly pleased with the PyCharm Community Edition IDE.